Typical days 1–2
Align and obtain access
Define the workflow boundary, intended outcome, participants, evidence sources, and decision the Sprint must support.
Start with the evidence
A focused engagement to understand how one workflow really operates, determine what the friction is costing, and decide whether further investment is justified.
Who the Sprint is for
The strongest Sprint opportunities have a repeatable workflow, a meaningful consequence, access to the people doing the work, and a decision-maker who wants evidence before investing.
The workflow repeats frequently enough to matter.
The friction creates meaningful labor, rework, delay, capacity loss, revenue risk, or trust risk.
A workflow owner and the people doing the work can participate.
Relevant examples, information, and available data can be reviewed.
There is uncertainty about the root cause, economics, or right solution.
The company is willing to act if the evidence supports action.
Why diagnosis comes first
Most companies do not need another blanket transformation program. They need to know whether one frustrating workflow is important enough to fix and which intervention has the strongest economic case.
The Sprint can responsibly conclude with a process change, an existing tool, automation, a focused build, or a decision to stop.
What happens during the Sprint
This is the typical sequence, not an artificial promise that every workflow behaves identically.
Typical days 1–2
Define the workflow boundary, intended outcome, participants, evidence sources, and decision the Sprint must support.
Typical days 2–4
Follow recent examples with the people doing the work. Separate the official process from what actually happens.
Typical days 4–7
Validate time, frequency, rework, delay, capacity, and supported risk without presenting estimates as measured facts.
Typical days 7–9
Identify the highest-value constraint and compare process, existing-tool, automation, focused-build, and stop paths.
By approximately day 10
Deliver the supported GO, REVISE, or STOP recommendation, executive brief, and build-ready blueprint when appropriate.
What you leave with
A view of how the work actually moves—from trigger to completed outcome.
The measurable and supported impact of time, rework, delay, trapped capacity, and risk.
The point in the workflow where a focused change can create the most value.
A supported GO, REVISE, or STOP decision with assumptions and confidence made visible.
When action is justified, a build-ready description of users, workflow, requirements, and success measures.
A concise decision brief and live working session for the people responsible for acting on it.
The decision
GO
REVISE
STOP
The Decision Clarity Promise
If the Sprint does not produce a supported GO, REVISE, or STOP decision, AIDIS Consulting will complete the additional analysis required at no additional professional fee.
No forced continuation
There is no obligation to hire AIDIS for implementation. If the case holds, AIDIS can design, build, deploy, and measure the solution. If it does not, the work stops before the expensive part.
Frequently asked questions
The paid work begins when AIDIS maps the real workflow, validates assumptions, models the economics, and becomes accountable for a decision-ready recommendation. It is designed to prevent the more expensive mistake of buying or building before the problem and requirements are clear.
AIDIS typically needs the workflow owner, at least one person who performs the work, recent real examples, and access to relevant operational information. A Sprint without operator access is usually a weak opportunity.
No. The right answer may be a process change, an existing tool, a simple automation, better documentation, a focused build, or no further investment. AIDIS earns trust by being willing to recommend the smallest responsible answer.
No. The Sprint is valuable as a standalone decision engagement. If a build is justified, AIDIS can scope and carry the work forward, but the client is not obligated to continue.
AIDIS can discuss broad ranges, but a defensible quote depends on the real workflow, users, integrations, constraints, success measures, and acceptance criteria established through diagnosis.
GO advances to a strictly scoped implementation decision. REVISE changes the approach before more money is committed. STOP closes the investment path and documents why further spending is not justified.
Start with one workflow
A short Workflow Review determines whether the problem appears appropriate for the fixed $3,000 Sprint. It is a fit conversation—not a free diagnosis.
Checking your estimate